Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Understanding Endings on Latin Comparative Adjectives

Understanding Endings on Latin Comparative Adjectives Parents of English-speaking children generally witness a phase in their childrens development when they seem confused as to the correct form of the comparative adjective. Is it more better, gooder, or what? That children generally do figure it out is part of the miracle of our ability to use language. When learning a second language as an adult, its much harder. Comparatives can definitely become eye-glossing-over material. They wouldnt be if the comparatives were all regular and easy, but there is little to tell you which adjectives are going to be regular, which in English means they take an -er or -ier ending, or irregular, which means... who knows what. Although we could probably do without this similarity with English, Latin, too, has not only regular  but also irregular adjectives: Bonus - good, melior/melius - better (irregular in Latin and English)Malus - bad, pejus/pejor - worse (irregular in Latin and English)Magnus - great, major/majus - greaterParvus - small, little, minor/minus -less (irregular in Latin and English)Multus - much, many, plures - more (irregular in Latin and English) In addition to having irregular adjectives in the comparative, Latin adjectives have to be declined to go along with the noun or pronoun they modify. Remember that declining an adjective to go along with the noun means that If the noun is neuter, so is the adjective.If the noun is plural, so is the adjective.If the noun is in one case, so is the adjective. In the comparative, you dont have to worry about whether the noun is masculine or feminine, just whether or not its neuter. Thats because the endings on comparative adjectives dont follow the 1st and 2nd declensions. Instead, comparative adjectives follow the 3rd declension, with the following exceptions. no -i, but an -e for the ablative singular,an -a instead of -ia for the neuter plural nominative/accusative, anda similar lack of /i/ for the neuter plural. Now well look at some actual declensions of an adjective in the comparative: the Latin for longer. The Latin for long is longus, -a, um. To find the base of the adjective, which you need, since you add the ending to it, look at the genitive and remove the genitival ending. The genitive singular forms of longus, -a, -um are longi, longae, longi. Removing the genitive endings leaves long-. It is to this base that the comparative endings are added, as shown: Singular nom. masc/fem. longiorgen. masc/fem. longiorisdat. masc/fem. longioriacc. masc/fem. longioremabl. masc/fem. longiorenom. neut. longiusgen. neut. longiorisdat. neut. longioriacc. neut. longiusabl. neut. longiore Plural nom. masc/fem. longioresgen. masc/fem. longiorumdat. masc/fem. longioribusacc. masc/fem. longioresabl. masc/fem. longioribusnom. neut. longioragen. neut. longiorumdat. neut. longioribusacc. neut. longioraabl. neut. longioribus

Saturday, November 23, 2019

American Revolution Essay Exam 2 Essays - American Revolution

American Revolution Essay Exam 2 Essays - American Revolution American Revolution Essay Exam 2 American Revolution "I have a right to!". How many times have you said this or heard someone else say this? Where did this come from? Your rights started with the American Revolution (War for Independence). There are several cause for the revolution from the French and Indian War of 1754 to the First Continental Congress meeting of 1774. Remember though, where the Enlightenment and the Great Awakening had affected the way many Americans thought about government these events strengthened their new ways of thinking even more. "No taxation without representation", this famous line, I believe was one of the most important reasons for the war of independence. One of the problems that led to the separation was the fact that Americans were not represented in British Parliament. After the Seven Years War (French and Indian War), the British began taxing the colonists. Britain supported "virtual representation" (The concept of virtual representation was employed by Prime Minister George Grenville to explain why Parliament could legally tax the colonists even though the colonists could not elect any members of Parliament. The theory of virtual representation held that the members of Parliament did not only represent their specific geographical constituencies, but rather that they took into consideration the well being of all British subjects when deliberating on legislation. - sparknotes.com/history/american/prerevolution/terms.html) . Most of the colonies' leaders considered themselves Americans, not Englishmen or British citizens, and demanded to be represented in parliament. Essentially it meant, "No taxation by Parliament. No representation in Parliament. Let us run our own affairs." The Stamp Act Congress in 1765 argued this form of representation. The Stamp Act of 1765 required every colonists to pay taxes on all printed documents. Such as, licenses, commercial contracts, newspapers, and playing cards. This was basically an attempt by the British to collect money without having any consent of the colonial assemblies. American leaders and colonists, as we as I mentioned above did like the idea of this, and believed it was taxation without representation. Soon mobs began rising up in many colonies to go against the Stamp Act. The Sons of Liberty, the largest mob in Boston, burned the stamps, began terrorizing the stamp agents, and attacked Thomas Hutchinson ( he supported the stamp act when it became law). With the boycotting expanding, eventually repealed the Stamp Act in 1766. In June of 1767 the Townshend Revenue Acts were passed. This put a tax on American imports-paper, paint ,tea, and glass. Just like with the Stamp Act, again the Americans refused to pay this tax. When boycotting began and governors began closing the assemblies other colonies were drug into the struggle. Originally this had really only affected Massachusetts, but now that the assemblies were being closed it started affecting all surrounding colonies. This helped to bring about the unity between very different colonies. Now the other colonies were more willing to help boycott and revolt against the British. British soldiers that King George had kept in the colonies were patrolling like usual. The Americans at this point thought that the soldiers were there to take away their liberties and rights. So in 1770 the colonists began tormenting them by cursing or spitting on them as they walked by. Soon (a mob of dockworkers) "liberty boys" starting throwing rocks/snowballs at the soldiers and adults, finding this amusing, stood around insulting the soldiers. When the crowd grew larger the soldiers panicked. They fired into crowd. Five Americans were killed during this event and it soon became known as the Boston Massacre to the Americans. Many stories were told about what had happened, but the truth was lost in the propaganda that later came out afterwards. With the Boston Massacre being interpreted as the soldiers executing the five Americans, the colonists became infuriated and wanted to rebel. Not long after, the soldiers were removed and taken to Boston Harbor island. (Paul Revere, The Bloody Massacre in King-Street, March 5, 1770. Boston, 1770. (Gilder Lehrman Collection) The Boston Tea Party was a result of the Tea Act of 1773. The colonists once again considered this "taxation without representation". A group of angered men decided to dress themselves as Indians and dump the tea off of the ships and

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Human Trafficking Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Human Trafficking - Essay Example This incorporates both males and females, innocent human beings that are unsuspecting. It is important to note that there is a distinct group of individuals associated with the alleged human trafficking and smuggling.   This is the so-called organized crime that befalls other individuals of unsuspecting nature.The above issue has become a great concern to the European States, which are now on a lookout to smother the crime. For instance, the States have at length laid prominence on cooperation in matters pertaining to criminology. Particularly, they have formed European organizations in the regions that work together with these other international organizations, which include United Nations Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights International, and Organization for Migrations. In order to understand these instances at depth, it is essential to be acquainted with the implication of the frequently used words; these include human trafficking and smuggling.Defining TraffickingHuma n trafficking is a human right matter. It defines human trafficking as unlawful trade of human beings for using them in slavery, moneymaking sexual abuse and compulsory labor. It also entails other current ways and forms of servant hood and abuse of the rights of people in using them as goods of trade for profit making. In practice and principle, trafficking can be both internal, meaning involving acts of within a country and the other kind of trafficking that is not necessarily the case., is one that involves illegal border crossing and transnational trafficking trade2. Looking at the same definitions of trafficking in depth, it uses a principle and practice that distinguishes it from smuggling in a broader way. As seen above, trafficking is seemingly legal since it is not by any means transitional. Again, it lacks illegal border crossing. This means that the individual victims that face human trafficking do not have problems in crossing the border getting in or out of Europe. It is painful to note that sufferers of human trafficking are portrayed as commodities owned by other individuals. These individuals owning them pay for their transport expenses that see them into or out of the European States and its borders. What stands out in this is that they are still denied their rights to, freely, move about, no wonder the States have come out to suppress this. Defining Smuggling Smuggling involves prohibited border-crossing and transnational unauthorized trade. In human beings, it is obtaining monetary or personal benefits through individuals by transporting them to another country without legal authorization. It is human miss-treatment involving agreed immigration and sheltering of noncitizens for the purpose of misuse of the entrants for achieving a gain. Furthermore, human smuggling is defined as a crime of transnational transportation of noncitizens of a State for a criminal gain. Most cases in smuggling involve personal acceptance of victim to be immigrated illegally. This makes illegal entrants more like customers who compensate for the services offered by the smuggler. It ends once the party being illegally reinstated to another country